Top Contenders of 2017
2017 saw a surge in popularity for gaming chairs, with numerous models vying for the top spot. This period marked a significant shift towards ergonomic design and increased focus on comfort during extended gaming sessions. Several brands established themselves as key players, offering a diverse range of features and price points. Analyzing the most reviewed chairs of that year provides valuable insight into the trends and preferences of gamers at the time.
Top Five Gaming Chairs of 2017
The following table lists five of the most reviewed gaming chairs from 2017, highlighting their key features and average user ratings (where available). Note that precise average user ratings can fluctuate depending on the platform and time of review. These figures represent a general consensus from various online sources at the time of the chairs’ release.
| Chair Name | Manufacturer | Notable Features | Average User Rating (Approximate) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DXRacer Formula Series | DXRacer | High-quality PU leather, adjustable lumbar support, headrest pillow, racing-style design | 4.5 out of 5 stars |
| Secretlab Omega | Secretlab | Premium PU leather or fabric options, 4D adjustable armrests, robust metal frame, excellent lumbar support | 4.7 out of 5 stars |
| Herman Miller Aeron | Herman Miller | Iconic design, breathable mesh fabric, highly adjustable, excellent ergonomic support, premium price point | 4.8 out of 5 stars |
| Maxnomic Pro Series | Maxnomic | High-density foam padding, adjustable lumbar support, wide seat, racing-style design | 4.4 out of 5 stars |
| Noblechairs Epic | Noblechairs | High-quality PU leather or fabric options, adjustable lumbar support, headrest pillow, robust build quality | 4.6 out of 5 stars |
Ergonomic Design Comparison: DXRacer Formula, Secretlab Omega, and Herman Miller Aeron
The DXRacer Formula, Secretlab Omega, and Herman Miller Aeron represent different approaches to ergonomic design. The DXRacer Formula focused on a racing-style aesthetic with adjustable lumbar support, offering a balance between comfort and visual appeal. The Secretlab Omega provided more advanced adjustability features, including 4D armrests, further enhancing customization for optimal posture. The Herman Miller Aeron, known for its minimalist design, prioritized breathability and long-term comfort through its innovative mesh fabric and extensive adjustability options. While all three offered lumbar support, the level of customization and the materials used varied significantly, impacting overall comfort. The Aeron, for example, was renowned for its ability to adapt to the user’s body shape over extended periods, reducing pressure points.
Materials and Durability
The construction materials varied significantly across these chairs. The DXRacer Formula and Secretlab Omega primarily used PU leather, offering a sleek appearance and relatively easy maintenance. However, PU leather can be prone to cracking or peeling with prolonged use and exposure to extreme temperatures. The Herman Miller Aeron utilized a breathable mesh fabric, prioritizing comfort and airflow, especially during extended use. This mesh fabric was generally more durable and resistant to wear and tear than PU leather. All three chairs incorporated metal frames for structural integrity, contributing to their overall longevity. The choice of materials directly influenced the chair’s durability and long-term performance, with the mesh fabric of the Aeron often considered more resilient than the PU leather of the other two.
User Experiences and Reviews: Best Gaming Chair 2017
User reviews offer invaluable insights into the real-world performance and satisfaction levels associated with 2017’s top gaming chairs. Analyzing this feedback helps potential buyers make informed decisions, understanding both the strengths and weaknesses of each model beyond marketing claims. This section dissects anonymized excerpts from online reviews, highlighting both positive and negative experiences to provide a balanced perspective.
Positive and Negative Review Excerpts
The following bullet points present anonymized excerpts from online reviews, categorized by positive and negative aspects. These represent a sample of the diverse feedback available online for popular 2017 gaming chairs.
- Positive: “The lumbar support is amazing! I have back problems and this chair has made a huge difference in my comfort during long gaming sessions.”
- Positive: “The build quality is exceptional. This chair feels incredibly sturdy and well-made. I expect it to last for years.”
- Positive: “The adjustable armrests are a game-changer. I can perfectly position them for optimal comfort and support.”
- Negative: “The assembly was a nightmare. The instructions were unclear and some parts didn’t fit properly.”
- Negative: “After a few months, the stitching started to come undone in several places. The quality seems to have deteriorated.”
- Negative: “The chair is quite stiff and uncomfortable for extended periods. I wish it had more cushioning.”
Comparative Chart of User Feedback on Key Features
This table summarizes user feedback across several key features, providing a concise overview of common experiences. The overall impression is a subjective synthesis of the positive and negative feedback.
| Feature | Positive Feedback | Negative Feedback | Overall Impression |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armrest Adjustability | “Highly customizable, perfect for different body types and postures.” “Easy to adjust, great range of motion.” | “Some reported difficulty adjusting, feeling stiff or loose.” “Limited range of adjustment for certain users.” | Mostly positive, but some inconsistencies in quality control. |
| Seat Height | “Perfect height for my desk, comfortable for long periods.” “Easy to adjust, wide range of height options.” | “Too low for some users.” “Difficult to adjust smoothly.” | Generally positive, but height range may not suit all users. |
| Backrest Recline | “Excellent recline range, perfect for relaxing and gaming.” “Smooth and easy to adjust.” | “Recline mechanism felt flimsy.” “Not enough recline for some.” | Mostly positive, but some concerns about durability of the mechanism. |
Recurring Themes in User Reviews, Best gaming chair 2017
Analysis of numerous reviews reveals several recurring themes. Common praise frequently centers on the quality of lumbar support and the adjustability of armrests, contributing to enhanced comfort and ergonomic benefits. Conversely, consistent complaints involve assembly difficulties, concerns about the durability of stitching and mechanisms, and inconsistencies in the overall comfort level across different users. Specific models sometimes faced more intense criticism regarding particular aspects, such as a certain chair receiving more complaints about its relatively low seat height or another model being criticized for insufficient padding.
